First, Brazil and Turkey are the epitome of the current global authoritarian turn in domestic politics, closely related to changes in international power, both globally and regionally. Erdoğan and Bolsonaro are clear examples of leaders who, despite having been democratically elected, raise divisive, conservative and religious flags in complex societies crossed by ethnic and racial diversity, through historic initiatives (not without tensions) to build a model of secular state, as well as by contradictory projects of social modernity. Both presidents blame liberal political values, underestimate democratic institutions and multilateralism, they satisfy their own political circles and bypass progressive social groups to justify their respective projects and increase their popular support.
Many of their foreign policy decisions are aimed at winning the hearts of national audiences, although some of them may have negative repercussions on the economic, social and environmental development of their countries. The comparison between the internal trajectories of both countries shows similarities in Whatsapp Mobile Number List at least one difference is striking: in Brazil, the transition from the democratic rule of law and pluralist government to a government model that threatens the Many of their foreign policy decisions are aimed at winning the hearts of national audiences, although some of them may have negative repercussions on the economic, social and environmental development of their countries.
The comparison between the internal trajectories of both countries shows similarities in many aspects, but at least one difference is striking: in Brazil, the transition from the democratic rule of law and pluralist government to a government model that threatens Many of their foreign policy decisions are aimed at winning the hearts of national audiences, although some of them may have negative repercussions on the economic, social and environmental development of their countries.